19.3 C
San Francisco
Wednesday, May 12, 2021

Arm China chief makes $179m gain on stake in chip company’s customer

Must read

Industry Insight Webinar | How Lawyers Can Use Tech to Make More Money

Law Technology Today May 11, 2021 Webinars Register here! May 19th, 2021...

Three Steps to Building an Effective Workflow in Legal

Related Articles For the contemporary lawyer, legal automation is playing an increasingly integral role. In fact, according...

WATCH: Dealing with Negative Google Reviews in Law Practice

WATCH ON YOUTUBE Speaker: Graham Anderson, Vice President of Sales at Kenect Getting a negative Google review can be frustrating, annoying, and downright...

Industry Insight Webinar | Managing the Chaos of a Cyber Incident

Law Technology Today May 7, 2021 Webinars Register here! May 12th, 2021...
mm
Laura Hansen
After working 4 years as a reputed journalist, Laura wanted to explore internet-based journalism. She brought together the idea of InstaTribune to dispatch news that serves the need of readers with perfect information. She also contributes as a business news writer for the website.

The head of Arm’s China business, Allen Wu, has made a Rmb1.2bn ($179m) gain on a personal investment he made in one of the chip designer’s Chinese clients, after falling out with Arm over alleged conflicts of interest.

Mr Wu has been fighting Arm for control of the Chinese joint venture since June last year, when he disregarded a 7-1 vote by Arm China’s board to remove him. He remains Arm China’s legal representative and holds the company’s official stamp, making it difficult to dislodge him under a centuries-old Chinese system.

He is also in control of the company’s Chinese bank account, which holds $500m to $600m, and has been used to pay his legal fees for a court battle with its majority shareholders, Arm and Chinese partner Hopu Investments, according to two people familiar with the matter. 

Arm China’s bank account has been further bolstered by frequent delays in remitting the licensing fees due to UK headquarters, four people close to the situation said.

- Advertisement -

One person involved in the dispute between the Arm China board and Mr Wu said he had advised the local government in Shenzhen, where the joint venture is registered, to place Mr Wu on a travel blacklist to prevent him from leaving China and to put restrictions on the bank account to prevent large transfers from being made. Mr Wu, 53, was born in China but is a US citizen.

An Arm China spokesperson speaking on behalf of Mr Wu said he had not been put on a blacklist and that the allegation was “completely fabricated”.

The spokesperson added that the operation of Arm China’s bank account was “fully compliant” with the company’s internal controls and Chinese law.

“Payment for legal fees is made in compliance with company policies,” the spokesperson said, adding that licensing fees had been paid according to its obligations under the joint venture agreement.

Mr Wu’s Rmb1.2bn windfall came from a 2019 investment in Bestechnic, which designs audio chips using Arm’s energy efficient blueprints and listed publicly in Shanghai last month. The Rmb127m investment was made by three investment funds under Mr Wu’s control, including the $100m fund he set up, Alphatecture

Their 3.2 per cent stake in Bestechnic had a market value of about Rmb1.3bn as of Friday. Bestechnic paid Rmb25m in licensing fees to Arm China in 2019.

People close to the Arm China board claimed that Mr Wu did not disclose his investment in the Arm client when it was made. One person added Mr Wu had not brought the investment opportunity to Hopu-Arm Innovation Fund, which had been set up to make investments in Arm’s ecosystem and where Mr Wu was co-chairman.

Mr Wu has previously defended making investments in Arm clients, saying it was “common practice in our industry”. Mr Wu’s spokesperson said the investment in Bestechnic was “fully disclosed”.

SoftBank, Arm’s owner, is leading negotiations with Mr Wu as the battle for the Chinese joint venture delays its plan to sell Arm to US chip company Nvidia for $40bn, which will also need approval from China’s market regulator. SoftBank in 2018 said China contributed a fifth of the chip designer’s overall sales. 

Nvidia is in discussions with Chinese regulators, but has not yet made a formal filing for a review of the deal, three people close to the situation said. 

A Chinese antitrust lawyer said the submission delay would make it very difficult to close the deal in the 18-month timeframe laid out when Arm and Nvidia announced it in September last year.

Daily newsletter

https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2F9e001719 ed93 484b b685 7fb2528c2d63

#techFT brings you news, comment and analysis on the big companies, technologies and issues shaping this fastest moving of sectors from specialists based around the world. Click here to get #techFT in your inbox.

Nvidia said: “The regulatory process is confidential and we won’t be providing comment on milestones along the way,” while reaffirming the 18-month timeline. 

SoftBank referred questions to Arm, which said: “Arm remains unwavering in our support of Arm China and its customers.”

Qianer Liu contributed reporting.

- Advertisement -

More articles

Latest article

Industry Insight Webinar | How Lawyers Can Use Tech to Make More Money

Law Technology Today May 11, 2021 Webinars Register here! May 19th, 2021...

Three Steps to Building an Effective Workflow in Legal

Related Articles For the contemporary lawyer, legal automation is playing an increasingly integral role. In fact, according...

WATCH: Dealing with Negative Google Reviews in Law Practice

WATCH ON YOUTUBE Speaker: Graham Anderson, Vice President of Sales at Kenect Getting a negative Google review can be frustrating, annoying, and downright...

Industry Insight Webinar | Managing the Chaos of a Cyber Incident

Law Technology Today May 7, 2021 Webinars Register here! May 12th, 2021...

WATCH: The Top 5 Ways Lawyers Can Improve Their Clients’ Experience

WATCH ON YOUTUBE Speaker: Erica Birstler, Vice President at CosmoLex People become lawyers for many different reasons. But no matter the reason that...
- Advertisement -